Constitutional Daily

Founding Principles

The Tenure Paradox - Robot pimp

Slap on the Wrist for "Non-Consensual Sex" - Lampshade, Esq.

Intelligence: The Gathering - Graphic and Gratuitous

Grads are the New Illegals - Robot Pimp

Meet Entitlement Eric - Robot Pimp

Wherein I Solve World Peace - Lampshade, Esq.

A Necessary Delusion - Shadow Hand

Do you even need to shave overhead? - Lawyerlite

LSAT Jenga - Publius Picasso

Time, Place, and Manner

...Should have some links here or something.


Large Numbers of Law, Week of 5/2/11

E-mail Print PDF

We know lawyers like to drink, but they hate dealing with numbers. So, here's a handy guide to let you keep track of just how much alcohol you're pouring down your lie hole: Large Numbers of Law, Week of 5/2/11.

Counting Electoral Eggs

E-mail Print PDF

We think it's a little early to start counting electoral eggs, given they're not only unhatched, but unlaid, and the electoral hens are still in their adolescence.

But, if you're the type who gets off on this sort of political masturbation, Karl Rove has an article out about what it would take for the GOP to take the Presidency.

270 votes are needed to win, and Rove thinks that 14 states with a combined 172 votes are in play. He expects that Indiana, Virgina, and North Carolina, which are traditionally Republican but supported Obama will go back in the red in 2012. If the GOP also managed to take perennial swing states of Ohio and Florida, it would need to pick up only 1 more of the remaining 9 states in play to capture the White House.

But, Rove doesn't get too hung up over the numbers, noting what it actually takes to win:

This election is within the GOP's grasp. The quality of the Republican candidate's campaign and message will decide whether it becomes so.

Even the most mindlessly-straight-party-line-voting Republican has to admit that there is not yet an inspiring, viable GOP hat in the ring. But, equally-mindlessly-straight-party-line-voting Democrats recognize Rove's keen understanding of American politics.


Which Situs?

E-mail Print PDF

With all the talk about the legality of Osama bin Laden's killing, we thought we'd throw out a question for you legal braniacs.

Jurisdiction in a criminal prosecution depends on the situs, that is, the location of the crime. If Johnnie shoots Jack in Georgia, Johnnie cannot be charged with murder in Tennessee, even if that is the state which Jack was a resident of. Some complications arise in weird situations, such as if Johnnie, standing in Georgia, shot across the border into Tennessee and killed Jack, but the easy solution is to just give the states concurrent jurisdiction.

Looking at the case of bin Laden, a criminal prosecution is not feasible. The US would never give over its Navy Seals to Pakistan for prosecution, and they would never be prosecuted back home. (The situs may be irrelevant for a domestic prosecution, as the military probably has jurisdiction over its active troops anywhere in the world. They just wouldn't be prosecuted for the other obvious reasons.)

So, here's the legal quandry: Assume that the killing of bin Laden was unlawful (this is what we like to call a "counter-factual"), could Barack Obama be prosecuted? Or, more specifically, what is the relevant situs in determining jurisdiction to prosecute a criminal conspiracy? Where the conspiracy itself occurred, or where the underlying criminal act took place?

Free Torts Case Book

E-mail Print PDF

Over on the Prawfs' Blawg, Eric Johnson has posted a link to his completed 2 volume torts case book, which can be downloaded for free.

Unlike most casebooks, Johnson's Torts Compendium does not contain notes and questions to accompany the cases. It's pure source material. So, it makes sense that his book would be free (to download, you still have to bear the cost of printing it), everything in it is part of the public domain.

The lack of commentary will make the book of limited use. The autodidact who realizes you don't actually have to go to law school to educate yourself about the law won't be provided with some necessary history and context. Students in most law school classes will still have to shell out money for a book with whatever numbers their prof wants written at the bottom of the page. The main beneficiaries will be his own students, and the students of professors who choose to use this book instead of the more expensive options.

But, his book highlights an interesting issue. The vast majority of material in other casebooks is also part of the public domain. The other things which may be copyrighted, such as essays or law review articles, are available to law students for free through their Lexis or Westlaw accounts.

The only things your traditional casebook provides are some notes, which are typically no more informative than the case's Wikipedia article, and questions without any answers or analysis.

Sure, there's also some editing done to cases to leave out the irrelevant parts, and Johnson's book does this as well, but what exactly are law professors charging their students for in case books, and why don't more follow Johnson's lead? You're already getting a salary paid by students' tuition, isn't one trip to the well enough?

[Torts Compendium Volume 1]

[Torts Compendium Volume 2]

Page 260 of 341

Philadelphia Lawyer, Unfiltered

The finest blend of analysis, advice, and fury on the internet. Sour mash, oak barrel aged, published at cask strength.


Most Recent Article:

In Defense of Risk (Happy Fourth of July)

All Articles from The Philadelphia Lawyer

Author Profile

The Robot Pimp

An in depth look at the emerging intersection of law, behavioral economics, and robots.

Most Recent Article:

The Tenure Paradox

All Articles from The Robot Pimp

Author Profile

Practice Makes Putrid

Legal practice would be all rainbows and buttercups, if it weren't for the clients, and opposing counsel, and co-counsel, and judges, and the law.

Most Recent Article:

Eat Mor Fiv Freedums

All Articles from The Namby Pamby

Author Profile

Gin and Glannon's

As Shadow Hand suffers through law school, the rest of us get a little Schadenfreude.

Most Recent Article:

I Just Work Here

All Articles From Shadow Hand

Author Profile

Irresistible Impulse

Dr. Rob Dobrenski's daring expedition into the psychology of lawyers and the law. (Not a substitute for a life well lived.)

Most Recent Article:

You're Not a Failure, You're a Narcissist

All Articles from Dr. Rob

Author Profile

Graphic and Gratuitous

Sometimes cartoons are the highest form of communication. Those times are known as "most of the time."

Most Recent Cartoons:

Intelligence: The Gathering

All Cartoons

There And Never Back Again

Defunct Big Law attorney BL1Y shares his misadventures as a writer who accidentally went to law school.


Most Recent Article:


All Articles from BL1Y

Author Profile

Lampshade, Esquire

We're dealing with some technical difficulties here. Hold up a minute.

All Articles From Lampshade, Esq.

Staff Infections

News, humor, and other non-billables from our underpaid, uncredited, unsexy staff.


News Articles

Smaller News Bits

Large Numbers of Law

Mixed Bag of Lawesome


Scofflaw Multistate Bar Review