Constitutional Daily

Founding Principles

The Tenure Paradox - Robot pimp

Slap on the Wrist for "Non-Consensual Sex" - Lampshade, Esq.

Intelligence: The Gathering - Graphic and Gratuitous

Grads are the New Illegals - Robot Pimp

Meet Entitlement Eric - Robot Pimp

Wherein I Solve World Peace - Lampshade, Esq.

A Necessary Delusion - Shadow Hand

Do you even need to shave overhead? - Lawyerlite

LSAT Jenga - Publius Picasso

http://www.constitutionaldaily.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1573:legal-reasoning-redux-5&catid=38:there-and-never-back-again&Itemid=65

Time, Place, and Manner

...Should have some links here or something.

Banner

Adding Substance to the LSAT

E-mail Print PDF

The LSAT is a perennial favorite for criticism. It doesn't have anything to do with law school or legal practice, and it measures nothing more than your ability to study for the LSAT. Neither of these criticisms is particularly good, but they still get made from year to year.

The LSAT tests two basic skills, logical reasoning and reading comprehension. Described like that, it's pretty easy to see what exactly the LSAT has to do with law school and legal practice. Not that there aren't plenty of lawyers lacking in either or both skills, but those lawyers are generally considered quite poor at their jobs.

As for the LSAT just testing whether you prepared adequately for the LSAT, law school and legal practice both require regularly require you to prepare for tests. If you can't spend a month or two learning how to master logic games, you probably lack the requisite skills to study for a law school exam or prepare for a trial.

The best defense of using the LSAT (in conjunction with UGPA) is that there really isn't anything better. It's not a perfect test, a lot of what it takes to be successful in law school and legal practice isn't tested. But, it is somewhat correlated with law school success, and it's all that we've got.

 

Somehow, despite all the known shortcomings of the LSAT, no one has bothered to look across campus at our medical counterparts and reach the obvious conclusion. Law school needs an equivalent test to the MCAT. A test of both basic intellectual skills, as the LSAT currently tests, and also basic knowledge required to get through law school, something equivalent to the bio-chem knowledge you need for the MCAT.

The design of the test is simple, it's a simplified version of the Multistate Bar Exam. None of the tricky questions or hard cases, just a test of really basic information. What are the elements of a contract? Difference between Murder I and Murder II? What are the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment? Okay, that last one wouldn't be on the MBE, but it's still background knowledge you'd really want a 0L to have.

Content of the MBE, difficulty level of the MPRE.

Grading for the exam would have one significant difference from grading for the LSAT. The bottom performers, people getting less than half the questions right, don't get a score at all. Their grade is simply "Fail." They might get a numerical grade that they can see, to tell if they were even close to making the cutoff. When applying to law schools though, the only message the schools see is "This applicant is incapable of learning basic legal concepts."

If you want a test that will predict your ability to succeed in law school and in the workplace, this is it.

The obvious snag though is that we're saying to get in to law school you must already be good at law school. But, isn't that what law school is supposed to teach you to do? Aren't we putting the cart before the horse?

That's where the difficulty level comes in. It really would need to be as easy to pass as the MPRE. It has a wider variety of content, so you'll need to study for more than two hours the night before, but the questions would all be quite basic. You might struggle in memorizing all the rules, but there should be little or no difficulty in understanding the concepts.

To eliminate the need for expensive prep classes (students have enough financial burdens as it is), the LSAC or whoever administers this test would put a comprehensive guide online, available for free. Print it out, read it a few times, make flash cards, whatever. At the end of the day, if given all the resources you need you can't teach yourself the elements of a burglary, you really have no business being in law school.

The test would reduce the law student headcount, but it's not a artificial barrier to entry design to improve the careers of other students. It's a very meaningful test of competence. It's eliminating from law school students who are likely to fail out or if they do graduate, students who will not pass the bar exam. Those aren't people who would be competing in the job market anyways. Those are however people that law schools ought not to be able to take $120,000 in tuition from, and people who need a clear, official message that law school will lead to financial ruin.

As an added bonus, the baby MBE would make law school a bit more useful. With everyone entering having the same background knowledge of basic legal concepts, law schools can spend more time focusing on the meatier issues, the things you couldn't learn on your own as easily. Just imagine how incredibly useless medical school would be if the first year was spent catching students up on freshman level biology and chemistry. And imagine how much less frustrating your 1L classes would be if the professor could answer stupid questions with "this was on the entrance exam."


blog comments powered by Disqus

Philadelphia Lawyer, Unfiltered

The finest blend of analysis, advice, and fury on the internet. Sour mash, oak barrel aged, published at cask strength.

 


Most Recent Article:

In Defense of Risk (Happy Fourth of July)


All Articles from The Philadelphia Lawyer

Author Profile

The Robot Pimp

An in depth look at the emerging intersection of law, behavioral economics, and robots.


Most Recent Article:

The Tenure Paradox


All Articles from The Robot Pimp

Author Profile

Practice Makes Putrid

Legal practice would be all rainbows and buttercups, if it weren't for the clients, and opposing counsel, and co-counsel, and judges, and the law.


Most Recent Article:

Eat Mor Fiv Freedums


All Articles from The Namby Pamby

Author Profile

Gin and Glannon's

As Shadow Hand suffers through law school, the rest of us get a little Schadenfreude.


Most Recent Article:

I Just Work Here


All Articles From Shadow Hand

Author Profile

Irresistible Impulse

Dr. Rob Dobrenski's daring expedition into the psychology of lawyers and the law. (Not a substitute for a life well lived.)


Most Recent Article:

You're Not a Failure, You're a Narcissist


All Articles from Dr. Rob

Author Profile

Graphic and Gratuitous

Sometimes cartoons are the highest form of communication. Those times are known as "most of the time."


Most Recent Cartoons:

Intelligence: The Gathering


All Cartoons

There And Never Back Again

Defunct Big Law attorney BL1Y shares his misadventures as a writer who accidentally went to law school.

 


Most Recent Article:

JD vs MFA


All Articles from BL1Y

Author Profile

Lampshade, Esquire

We're dealing with some technical difficulties here. Hold up a minute.


All Articles From Lampshade, Esq.

Staff Infections

News, humor, and other non-billables from our underpaid, uncredited, unsexy staff.

 


News Articles

Smaller News Bits

Large Numbers of Law

Mixed Bag of Lawesome

Reviews

Scofflaw Multistate Bar Review

Lawyerlite