Constitutional Daily

Founding Principles

The Tenure Paradox - Robot pimp

Slap on the Wrist for "Non-Consensual Sex" - Lampshade, Esq.

Intelligence: The Gathering - Graphic and Gratuitous

Grads are the New Illegals - Robot Pimp

Meet Entitlement Eric - Robot Pimp

Wherein I Solve World Peace - Lampshade, Esq.

A Necessary Delusion - Shadow Hand

Do you even need to shave overhead? - Lawyerlite

LSAT Jenga - Publius Picasso

http://www.constitutionaldaily.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1573:legal-reasoning-redux-5&catid=38:there-and-never-back-again&Itemid=65

Time, Place, and Manner

...Should have some links here or something.

Banner

Eat Mor Fiv Freedums

E-mail Print PDF

There is a constitutional controversies brewing in my hometown and it seems that Chicagoans have elected leaders that want to ignore the First Amendment.

Yesterday the latest Chicago controversy emerged on the news, on Twitter and every other medium in between (such as Fox News). It is blatant disregard for the first amendment that the Mayor and my Alderman are publicly engaging in to deny a job-creating, tax-paying business from opening just down the road from where I live. The business is Chick-Fil-A and the reason that is apparently the hang-up is that the parent company supports fiscally groups that espouse traditional Christian values and oppose same-sex marriage.

This is not news.

Anyone who has bothered to Google or Wikipedia the company can readily see that it is a company that is religiously conservative. This is the food chain that is closed on Sunday to observe (shockingly) the Sabbath and whose motto begins “To glorify God...”. The company, according to the news coverage surrounding this kerfuffle, have always supported groups like the ones at issue here but at the same time, do not discriminate in their business. In sum, the corporation and their executives have a position on a political issue. And this, according to Mayor Rahm Emmanuel and Alderman Joe Moreno they will not be allowed building permits to open an additional store as the company doesn’t represent Chicago values. Lest you think I am trying to subvert the words or actions of the main players, here is what Alderman Moreno said today in his Op-Ed piece published by the Chicago Tribune:

“Initially, I had some traffic concerns with their plan. But then I heard the bigoted, homophobic comments by Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy, who recently came out against same-sex marriage. There are consequences for one's actions, statements and beliefs. Because of this man's ignorance, I will deny Chick-fil-A a permit to open a restaurant in my ward...”

If this isn’t viewpoint based discrimination, I am not sure what is. Apparently, it was a big secret to the Chicago City Council and the mayor that these were the corporate values when the first Chick-Fil-A was licensed and opened in Chicago two years ago.

Can you imagine the City of Chicago engaging in zoning shenanigans with the Catholic Church because they don’t support gay marriage? Of course not. If we wanted to play this out a little further, the largest health insurance company in the state, Blue Cross and Blue Shield will be targeted for elimination as their employees were the largest campaign contributors to Rick Santorum. Next thing we are going to hear about is how the Chicago Cubs have been evicted from Wrigley Field as one of their owners has a conservative political action committee.  Not that that would necessarily be a bad thing for us long suffering Cubs fans mind you.

Let be very clear, I love Chick-Fil-A and I don’t give a hot damn what their corporate headquarters or Dear Leader gives money to nor do I care about what causes they support. I am sure that I frequent plenty of businesses that engage in political activities or have policies that I would find offensive, but these activities are protected by the First Amendment thus leaving me to judge them in whatever way I choose. Because I am a private citizen, and I have the power to engage in content and viewpoint based discrimination in choosing where to buy delicious, perfectly fried chicken sandwiches. So do you. If you don't like the way corporate profits are spent, you don't have to eat there. The state on the other hand doesn't get that freedom. It doesn't get to deny your business the right to operate because it doesn't like the way you spend your rightfully gained profits.

These corporate entities have every right to do with their profits as they see fit and people who are much smarter than I am think that this is perfectly constitutional. I think that Chicagoans who are offended, angered or irate have the ability to protest the corporate policy whether it be by peaceful demonstration or not frequenting the establishment. Freezing a business out of a market for their political or religious views is a horrible idea and ridiculously unconstitutional.

For the most part, the news coverage that I have read has rightfully addressed the egregious assault on the First Amendment and what sort of behavior this could lead to if allowed to stand. This sort of constitutional intolerance is nothing new in the City of Broad Shoulders but I can hope that someone kindly reminds the Chicago Politburo.

[Read more from The Namby Pamby]


blog comments powered by Disqus

Philadelphia Lawyer, Unfiltered

The finest blend of analysis, advice, and fury on the internet. Sour mash, oak barrel aged, published at cask strength.

 


Most Recent Article:

In Defense of Risk (Happy Fourth of July)


All Articles from The Philadelphia Lawyer

Author Profile

The Robot Pimp

An in depth look at the emerging intersection of law, behavioral economics, and robots.


Most Recent Article:

The Tenure Paradox


All Articles from The Robot Pimp

Author Profile

Practice Makes Putrid

Legal practice would be all rainbows and buttercups, if it weren't for the clients, and opposing counsel, and co-counsel, and judges, and the law.


Most Recent Article:

Eat Mor Fiv Freedums


All Articles from The Namby Pamby

Author Profile

Gin and Glannon's

As Shadow Hand suffers through law school, the rest of us get a little Schadenfreude.


Most Recent Article:

I Just Work Here


All Articles From Shadow Hand

Author Profile

Irresistible Impulse

Dr. Rob Dobrenski's daring expedition into the psychology of lawyers and the law. (Not a substitute for a life well lived.)


Most Recent Article:

You're Not a Failure, You're a Narcissist


All Articles from Dr. Rob

Author Profile

Graphic and Gratuitous

Sometimes cartoons are the highest form of communication. Those times are known as "most of the time."


Most Recent Cartoons:

Intelligence: The Gathering


All Cartoons

There And Never Back Again

Defunct Big Law attorney BL1Y shares his misadventures as a writer who accidentally went to law school.

 


Most Recent Article:

JD vs MFA


All Articles from BL1Y

Author Profile

Lampshade, Esquire

We're dealing with some technical difficulties here. Hold up a minute.


All Articles From Lampshade, Esq.

Staff Infections

News, humor, and other non-billables from our underpaid, uncredited, unsexy staff.

 


News Articles

Smaller News Bits

Large Numbers of Law

Mixed Bag of Lawesome

Reviews

Scofflaw Multistate Bar Review

Lawyerlite