Constitutional Daily

Founding Principles

The Tenure Paradox - Robot pimp

Slap on the Wrist for "Non-Consensual Sex" - Lampshade, Esq.

Intelligence: The Gathering - Graphic and Gratuitous

Grads are the New Illegals - Robot Pimp

Meet Entitlement Eric - Robot Pimp

Wherein I Solve World Peace - Lampshade, Esq.

A Necessary Delusion - Shadow Hand

Do you even need to shave overhead? - Lawyerlite

LSAT Jenga - Publius Picasso

Time, Place, and Manner

...Should have some links here or something.


Large Numbers of Law - Romney's Taxes

E-mail Print PDF

One of the reasons why the capital gains tax rate is lower is because capital has already been taxed once at the corporate level, as high as 35 percent.

That's Mitt Romney's defense of his low tax rate during his 60 Minutes interview with Scott Pelley. And he's wrong. He's not wrong that the corporate tax structure can result in double taxation, but he is wrong about why his own taxes are so low.

For those who haven't studied corporate income taxes, here's a quick primer on how they work. First thing to know is that corporate income taxes are not taxes on corporate income. That is, the corporation's revenues aren't taxed; instead we tax corporate profits. If we taxed revenues then companies with narrow profit margins would be quickly driven out of business.

Corporate tax rates range from 15-35%, and every major corporation is going to be big enough to be at the 35% rate. Marginal corporate tax rates work differently than marginal personal income tax rates. If you make $400,000 your marginal rate is 35%, but your effective rate is only 29.19%. The 35% rate only applies to the money in excess of $388k that you're earning, and the higher rate doesn't apply retroactively. With corporate taxes it does apply retroactively. Not immediately upon hitting the new rate (because then it'd sometimes make sense to be less profitable), but as you go up it starts to apply to a greater percentage of your profits until you hit an effective 35% rate.

That's just a little quirk of corporate taxation though, and not really relevant.


Since we're only taxing profits, taxes on a corporation might look something like this:

Goliath Corp has $50 million in revenues in 2011.

Goliath Corp also has $45 million in expenses, resulting in $5 million in profits.

That $5 million is taxed at 35%. Goliath pays $1,750,000 in taxes and has $3,250,000 left over in profits.

Goliath distributes that $3.25 million to its shareholders as dividends.

The shareholders now pay the capital gains rate of 15% on that $3.25 million. Another $487.500 in taxes is paid.

Total taxes paid are $2,237,500. The total taxes paid on Goliath's profits are 44.75%.

This is what Mitt Romney is describing. The 15% capital gains rate looks incredible low and disgustingly unfair to the working class, but once we look at taxes paid at both levels it starts to make a lot of sense, and the amount is much higher than the highest personal income tax rate.


What Romney gets wrong is that his income has not already been taxed at the corporate rate.

Remember, corporations are only taxed on their profits, not their revenues. This means that corporations can reduce their taxes by increasing their expenses. For instance, when Goliath Corp sees that it has an extra $5 million, it can pay its directors another $1 million in bonuses, spend $1 million buying heavy machinery for its manufacturing, spend $2 million on real estate investments, and the last $1 million buying stock in other companies.

Now Goliath has $50 million in revenues and $50 million in expenses. It's tax burden is $0. Of course, you might be wondering if it has $0 in profits then what money is going to the shareholders?

The answer is stock value.

When Goliath re-invests $4 million (the bonuses are an expense, but not a re-investment) its total value as a corporation goes up. It's stock was previously at $10 per share, now it's at $10.15.

A wealthy shareholder now sells 100,000 shares, realizes $15,000 in capital gains, and pays a 15% rate on that. They money has never been taxed at the corporate level and that 15% is all the taxes paid.


In 2011 Mitt Romney had $10.3 million in income that was taxed at the capital gains rate. $3.5 million was dividend income, taxed at both the corporate rate and the capital gains rate. The remaining $6.8 million was through share appreciation and taxed only once, at the 15% rate. Doing a little math here can tell us his actual rate (just on the investment stuff, excluding other sources of income).

To get $3.5 million in dividend income, the companies must have made $5.4 million in profits. They were then taxed 35% ($1.9 million), passed on the remaining $3.5 million to Romney, and he paid 15% ($525,000) on that. He also paid 15% ($1,020,000) on the other $6.8 million.

So, we're starting at the corporate level with $12.2 million, and by the time the company and Romney have both paid their taxes, a total of $3.4 million of taxes have been paid. That gives us an effective rate of 27.9%.

Had all the money been taxed just at the personal income rate, eliminating the corporate tax, the rate would have been 35%.

Had all the money been subject to double taxation at both the corporate and personal levels, the rate would have been 44.75%.

Instead, Mitt Romney sees his investments bring him $10.3 million and pays taxes at the same rate as someone earning $300,000 in wages.

[More Large Numbers of Law]

blog comments powered by Disqus

Philadelphia Lawyer, Unfiltered

The finest blend of analysis, advice, and fury on the internet. Sour mash, oak barrel aged, published at cask strength.


Most Recent Article:

In Defense of Risk (Happy Fourth of July)

All Articles from The Philadelphia Lawyer

Author Profile

The Robot Pimp

An in depth look at the emerging intersection of law, behavioral economics, and robots.

Most Recent Article:

The Tenure Paradox

All Articles from The Robot Pimp

Author Profile

Practice Makes Putrid

Legal practice would be all rainbows and buttercups, if it weren't for the clients, and opposing counsel, and co-counsel, and judges, and the law.

Most Recent Article:

Eat Mor Fiv Freedums

All Articles from The Namby Pamby

Author Profile

Gin and Glannon's

As Shadow Hand suffers through law school, the rest of us get a little Schadenfreude.

Most Recent Article:

I Just Work Here

All Articles From Shadow Hand

Author Profile

Irresistible Impulse

Dr. Rob Dobrenski's daring expedition into the psychology of lawyers and the law. (Not a substitute for a life well lived.)

Most Recent Article:

You're Not a Failure, You're a Narcissist

All Articles from Dr. Rob

Author Profile

Graphic and Gratuitous

Sometimes cartoons are the highest form of communication. Those times are known as "most of the time."

Most Recent Cartoons:

Intelligence: The Gathering

All Cartoons

There And Never Back Again

Defunct Big Law attorney BL1Y shares his misadventures as a writer who accidentally went to law school.


Most Recent Article:


All Articles from BL1Y

Author Profile

Lampshade, Esquire

We're dealing with some technical difficulties here. Hold up a minute.

All Articles From Lampshade, Esq.

Staff Infections

News, humor, and other non-billables from our underpaid, uncredited, unsexy staff.


News Articles

Smaller News Bits

Large Numbers of Law

Mixed Bag of Lawesome


Scofflaw Multistate Bar Review