Constitutional Daily

Founding Principles

The Tenure Paradox - Robot pimp

Slap on the Wrist for "Non-Consensual Sex" - Lampshade, Esq.

Intelligence: The Gathering - Graphic and Gratuitous

Grads are the New Illegals - Robot Pimp

Meet Entitlement Eric - Robot Pimp

Wherein I Solve World Peace - Lampshade, Esq.

A Necessary Delusion - Shadow Hand

Do you even need to shave overhead? - Lawyerlite

LSAT Jenga - Publius Picasso

http://www.constitutionaldaily.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1573:legal-reasoning-redux-5&catid=38:there-and-never-back-again&Itemid=65

Time, Place, and Manner

...Should have some links here or something.

Banner

Large Numbers of Law - Algebraic Value of Law School

E-mail Print PDF

"I never would have been able to succeed in Alternative Career P without my JD and the vital critical thinking skills I learned in law school!"

We've all heard this at some point. Too bad the whole thinking like a lawyer thing didn't also include thinking like someone capable of basic algebra.

 

B = Baseline intellect before law school

JD = Intellectual value added during law school

X = Minimum intellectual capacity needed to succeed in Alternative Career P.

Looking back at our original premise, "I never would have been able to succeed in Alternative Career P without my JD and the vital critical thinking skills I learned in law school!" we are able to produce the following equation:

B + JD = X

Those of you who still remember 8th grade Algebra will quickly realize the above equation is the same as the following:

X - JD = B

See where this is going? If you needed your JD to be able to do Alt Career P, then your baseline intellect (B) is lower than the intellect of every other schmo hacking in Career P. And, the more valuable your JD was, the bigger the intellectual deficit you started with.

 

"Wait, wait, wait! I didn't literally mean I 'never would have been able'! I probably could have done Alt Career P without my JD, but it's helped a whole lot."

Okay, so now all we need to do is introduce a new level. You're not at X, which was the minimum capacity, but now Y, which is a higher level of performance than X. ...And you're left with the same problem.

B + JD = Y

Y - JD = B

Find someone else operating at level Y, and whatever you think the value of your JD is must also be your intellectual deficit. An example:

Law Grad (LG) opens up a restaurant. He has to deal with corporate formation issues, contract issues, employment law, etc. While he maybe could have spent some time on Google and a few bucks on a discount lawyer to get through all this stuff without a JD, the JD still did come in handy. Plus, he's extra-successful because of his heightened intellectual capacity earned in his 3 years of law school.

Next door to LG's restaurant is another restaurant, founded by Recent Immigrant (RI). RI doesn't have a JD, or even a college degree. Instead, RI has only taken a few business classes at the community college.

LG and RI's businesses see roughly the same amount of success. If LG's JD was helpful in getting him to his present level of success with his restaurant, we can produce this equation:

LG + JD = RI

RI - JD = LG

LG was at such an intellectual deficit that in order to compete with RI's 12 community college credits, he had to go through 3 years of legal training and get a JD.

 

Human beings tend to want to place a lot of value on their experience and their choices. We don't like feeling that we've made huge mistakes, and law school is no exception. Yet we get an interesting conundrum. The more you claim your legal education helped you out, the more you're saying you weren't smart enough to hack it to begin with.

[More Large Numbers of Law]


blog comments powered by Disqus

Philadelphia Lawyer, Unfiltered

The finest blend of analysis, advice, and fury on the internet. Sour mash, oak barrel aged, published at cask strength.

 


Most Recent Article:

In Defense of Risk (Happy Fourth of July)


All Articles from The Philadelphia Lawyer

Author Profile

The Robot Pimp

An in depth look at the emerging intersection of law, behavioral economics, and robots.


Most Recent Article:

The Tenure Paradox


All Articles from The Robot Pimp

Author Profile

Practice Makes Putrid

Legal practice would be all rainbows and buttercups, if it weren't for the clients, and opposing counsel, and co-counsel, and judges, and the law.


Most Recent Article:

Eat Mor Fiv Freedums


All Articles from The Namby Pamby

Author Profile

Gin and Glannon's

As Shadow Hand suffers through law school, the rest of us get a little Schadenfreude.


Most Recent Article:

I Just Work Here


All Articles From Shadow Hand

Author Profile

Irresistible Impulse

Dr. Rob Dobrenski's daring expedition into the psychology of lawyers and the law. (Not a substitute for a life well lived.)


Most Recent Article:

You're Not a Failure, You're a Narcissist


All Articles from Dr. Rob

Author Profile

Graphic and Gratuitous

Sometimes cartoons are the highest form of communication. Those times are known as "most of the time."


Most Recent Cartoons:

Intelligence: The Gathering


All Cartoons

There And Never Back Again

Defunct Big Law attorney BL1Y shares his misadventures as a writer who accidentally went to law school.

 


Most Recent Article:

JD vs MFA


All Articles from BL1Y

Author Profile

Lampshade, Esquire

We're dealing with some technical difficulties here. Hold up a minute.


All Articles From Lampshade, Esq.

Staff Infections

News, humor, and other non-billables from our underpaid, uncredited, unsexy staff.

 


News Articles

Smaller News Bits

Large Numbers of Law

Mixed Bag of Lawesome

Reviews

Scofflaw Multistate Bar Review

Lawyerlite